All Posts Tagged With: "Ryerson University"
‘Don’t make surprise, unannounced visits’
Ryerson advises students and parents how to cope with university
Ryerson’s department of public affairs has some advice for students and parents to help both adjust to university life.
Here are the tips for students:
1. Relax. Everyone else is going through the same thing you’re going through. So go and introduce yourself to someone new. Chances are they don’t know anyone else either.
2. Get to know your city. Get on public transit and get familiar with the different travel routes.
3. It’s OK if you don’t know how to do everything right away. That’s what your family and friends are there for. So call them up.
4. Prioritize. It may be easy to “forget” to do your readings and keep up with your work, but if you let these things slide, chances are you won’t have a reason to be living on your own for much longer.
5. Get connected. There are numerous events going on to suit everyone’s tastes. Whether it be program-specific, faculty-wide, religious, athletic, or just plain entertainment — there’s a little something for everyone. This is your chance to meet new people, and the more people you meet, and the more activities you do, the less likely you are to be homesick.
6. Have a late class? Stayed late at the library? Be safe. Check out your school’s website for security programs or head over to your student union office to find out what they can do for you.
7. Balance is the key. There is so much going on all the time that you can easily lose track of time — so allocate it efficiently. Make sure you have time for your studies, yourself, and time to go out and have fun.
8. Enjoy it all. There are going to be some really great times, some really bad times, and some in the middle, but all of these experiences are necessary for you to get accustomed to this new life. So stay positive.
And here are the tips for parents:
1. Your continued support through any changes (dress, interests, level of academic success, etc.) will be an important part of your student’s success.
2. Don’t be surprised if there is an initial drop in grades or concern about workload.
3. Send pictures and news items from your hometown paper.
4. Don’t make surprise, unannounced visits.
5. Expect the frequency of communication to lessen with time, it means they’ve made a successful transition. If there is a sudden drop-off in contact, however, calmly and tactfully inquire to see if things are OK.
6. Write even if they don’t write back.
7. Ask questions, but not too many. Express interest without seeming like you’re interfering. Remember, this is a transition into independence. Students may take excessive parental interest to mean that you don’t trust them as they are gaining a sense of autonomy.
8. Anticipate more bad news than good news, at least at first.
9. Students are under a lot of pressure and stress, with a fair measure of insecurity. So when those first phone calls come, do not respond by saying, “But these are the best years of your life.”
10. Assess how street-smart your son or daughter is. Discuss safety issues with them and encourage them to find out about campus safety and security, travelling around campus at night and emergency procedures.
Undercover RCMP officer kicked out of Ryerson
Officer in plain clothes tried to monitor 10 G20 protesters from the student paper’s office
If you are planning to protest the G20 meeting being held in Toronto, and you want to make plans from the Ryerson University Student Campus Centre, be warned that the RCMP may be watching you. Late Wednesday afternoon, officer Leslie Tull, who was wearing plain clothes, was using the office of student paper the Eyeopener, to observe 10 protesters in the student run building. According to the paper, Tull “refused requests to leave while asking several people in the office if they knew how many exits were in the building and if the protesters could be kicked out.” After Eyeopener staff contacted security,students’ union president Toby Whitfield had Tull escorted off campus.
Cheat and you shall be rewarded
Ryerson student charged with academic misconduct files $10 million class action suit
Sigh. It is hard to get through a week without reading about a university student somewhere suing their university. Some cases are unabashed, and ridiculous, in the sense of entitlement demonstrated by the suing student. The University of Winnipeg was once brought to court by a student who was angling for an A in one class, over the B+ he was actually assigned. Other cases demonstrate clear misconduct on the part of the university. In Sept 2008, Laurentian University was found liable after it was concluded to have mislead students over whether they could transfer their Laurentian courses elsewhere.
The case of Chris Avenir, who has filed a $10 million class action lawsuit against Ryerson University over an academic misconduct hearing he faced in 2008, on first blush appears to fall into the category of just another self-entitled student looking to escape accountability for his own actions. And yet it raises important questions of a university’s academic misconduct policies.
Avenir gained international attention in March 2008 after he faced expulsion for administering a Facebook study group the previous semester. The Facebook group invited students to provide answers: “If you request to join, please use the forms to discuss/post solutions to the chemistry assignments. Please input your solutions if they are not already posted.” A professor who had mandated that course work be done individually noticed the group and changed Avenir’s grade to an F on the assignment. Ryerson’s academic misconduct policy very clearly states that “working collaboratively on an assignment, and then submitting it as if it was created solely by you,” is prohibited. In other words, work that is to be done independently, must actually be done independently.
Avenir, who was then a first-year engineering student, was forced to face a faculty appeal panel, which could recommend his expulsion. The panel ultimately gave him a slap on the wrist, and ruled only that he should receive a grade of zero for the assignment in question, which was worth only 10 per cent of his mark for the class. He might have left it at that, comforted in the fact that he didn’t get a zero for the entire class, or that he wasn’t recommended for expulsion. Lesson learned.
Instead, Avenir is alleging that the faculty appeal process caused “significant emotional and/or mental stress,” and has filed a Statement of Claim on behalf of all students who have gone through a similar appeal process in recent years.
The point of contention appears to be, according to the Toronto Star, is that at the panel Avenir was not permitted to be represented by a lawyer. At Ryerson, preliminary hearings, like this one, only allow a representative from the student union to be present. While the panel can recommend more serious sanctions, like expulsion, such cases must be heard by the university’s senate, in which case, a lawyer may be present.
As the Star reports, “The statement of claim suggests Ryerson violated a policy that states all hearings will be consistent with the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, which guarantees a person the right to be represented by a lawyer.”
Whether Ryerson will be found to be in contravention of its own policy will be decided by the courts, but it is not exactly an easy question. A student union executive told the Star that a representative from the union might actually be better suited, at least for preliminary hearings, than outside legal representation. Then again, other universities, like the University of Toronto, allow students to be represented by legal counsel through the entire hearing process.
As for the question of “emotional distress,” any law students or lawyers reading, your insights in the comments would be helpful. But it seems to me that having to go in front of an academic misconduct committee, charged with cheating, is likely to be “emotionally stressful” whether a lawyer is present or not. Reviewing Ryerson’s academic misconduct policy is probably a good idea, but I can’t help but think that filing a class action lawsuit is excessive.
Ryerson goes bottled water free
Plastic containers condemned
On March 11, 2010, I was duped.
Yes, the collaborative efforts of the Canadian Federation of Students, the Sierra Youth Coalition, and the Polaris Institute got me.
Apparently, “Bottled Water Free Day” is nothing as it sounds. I know; I was shocked too! Not only did I not get my free bottle of water, but I found out that the very cap I untwist to seek refreshment can unearth a Pandora’s box of campus sin!
Defeated and embarrassed, I went home to mull over my misstep.
What was I missing? Clearly, Evian and Nestle were up to something dire; why else would student leaders be using my fees to campaign for something completely not student related?
Then I saw the press release: “Ryerson pledges to be first bottled water free campus in Ontario.”
OK, OK, something’s definitely going on; or else, why would my university pledge to eliminate all bottled water from campus? A band-aid move that reeks of appeasement? When everyone knows that prohibition will only create resentment? And that the way to get people to really align with your views is through reasoned argument and persuasion, not mandating its acceptance?
I stared at my half-empty Dasani. Oh, you’re trouble, aren’t you? That’s why my university has decided to stunt one of our few healthy consumer trends. Why the Ryerson Student Union has suddenly been granted the right to decide what others can purchase on campus?
Finally, after hours of reflection, I’m down to three possible conclusions:
Either:
• Bottled water was the root cause of the 5-3 upset suffered by the Canadian men’s Olympic hockey team to the United States in Vancouver this past February
Or:
• The grooves on many water bottles somehow serve as capitalist symbols
Or:
• Bottled water is responsible for high tuition fees
You decide…
-Photo by Cesar Vivas
A prof’s view of the Ryerson racism report
Academic life gets complicated when tolerance and freedom clash.
Ryerson University released its sweeping report into racism on campus, yesterday, and the full text of the report was just made available on its web site today. Looking over its recommendations, one sees numerous suggestions that will, if implemented, surely make Ryerson a better place. Still, in the areas where the report deals with the issues of warming the “chilly climate” at the University, especially when it comes to teaching, I suspect many readers will be struck by just how vexing the intellectual problems are.
Related: Ryerson racism probe seeks to coddle students
These questions are not unique to Ryerson, of course. I arrived at the University of Western Ontario as an undergraduate when the furor was raging over psychologist Phillipe Rushton and his research on racial differences; my view then was the same as it is now, that Rushton’s work should be judged by his peers in the field of psychology, not by protesters or politicians. Not too long after that, a scathing report came out at Western about the “chilly climate” for women on campus, which sparked wide-spread debate. Here at my own university, I was once shocked when student advocates told members of my school that we should never use racist language, even if it meant avoiding teaching classics of literature like Huckleberry Finn. We didn’t have the skills, we were told, to deal with the complexities of the issue.
I have been to Ryerson, by the way, though I did not spend enough time there to know it intimately, so I freely admit that I cannot speak to the specific conditions there. But I do find the larger questions intriguing, and would like to venture a few more thoughts occasioned by the new report.
Consider, for example, recommendation 6C, which calls for a stronger anti-discrimination policy at the school, and for every course outline to include a statement to the effect that all individuals are to be treated “with respect and dignity.” So far, so good. I include such a statement in my own syllabi, though my university does not require it. But note carefully what follows:
Ryerson racism probe seeks to coddle students
University isn’t about making you feel good. It’s about confronting challenges.
Ryerson University, in all her racist glory, graced the front page of the Toronto Star Monday.
I know; I couldn’t believe it either. I didn’t know purgatorial images were allowed on the front page.
Well, nevermind. The real story is that a university-commissioned probe into campus racism identified serious issues at the school. Its 107-page report recommended specific and swift action to tackle the problems.
So, what were the issues? Well, some were of legitimate concern. The Task Force on Anti-Racism at Ryerson cited a few specific examples of harassment and vandalism, which, I agree, should be dealt with harshly and swiftly. But most of it? Hyperbole and pandering, I’m sorry to say. Obviously a task force committed to sniffing out racism will find something. They don’t want to be deemed useless, after all.
I’ve spent nearly four years at Ryerson and have personally found it to be one of the most multicultural, inclusive, and culturally sensitive institutions I’ve ever encountered. Sure, maybe that’s my complacency/privilege/ignorance speaking, but from what I’ve observed, the campus is fairly harmonious (which says a lot, considering it’s a university). Globe writer Marcus Gee shares my view. “Ryerson University is one of the most diverse and welcoming universities in the country, if not the world,” he writes. Gee continues:
Under president Sheldon Levy, Ryerson has bent over backward to celebrate and encourage diversity. The university already has active programs on employment equity, a special office to serve aboriginal students and a prayer space for Muslim worshippers. At the university’s Ted Rogers School of Management, five of the 11 faculty hired in 2008 were visible minorities, just short of its target of six. Other faculties are striving to bring up their numbers, too.
The Toronto Star ignored these details in its article. Here are the more… umm… poignant excerpts:
Some observant Muslim students complained teachers often use jokes about sex that can make them uncomfortable.
One professor who was teaching students how to modulate their voices for radio told the class to pretend they were having sex and to imagine the voice they heard when they experience “pleasure.” Other students joined in and began making “very weird noises,” leaving some students very uncomfortable.
This line’s a gem:
Others longed for teachers who look like them, especially aboriginal and black students.
And straight from students’ mouths:
“Professors don’t address issues of inappropriate language.”
“I think a lot of Jewish students don’t run for student leadership positions because of the hostile environment and so they don’t have to vote for anti-Israel resolutions.”
Hmm. So what? We should be hiring professors for their looks, not their qualifications? (I wonder if the Force will advocate on behalf of the few men in my program, who swim in a sea of aspiring women-journalist, for more professors who “look like them.”) And what of the inappropriate language? Sexual innuendos? Hurt feelings? I thought we were out of middle school.
University is not supposed to make you feel comfortable. Sorry. Stay at home if you want to be coddled. University is one of those unique places where individuals are encouraged to express their beliefs and challenge their assumptions. And yes, some will often be offended. Personally, I celebrate it. What better opportunity to explore your own preconceptions than face that which irks you? And if you don’t like it: avoid it, challenge it, but don’t stifle it. If university can’t be a sanctuary for free speech, what can be?
Compulsory anti-racism courses for staff and students, as recommended by the racism report, won’t fix anything. You can’t force out ideology with a couple obligatory lectures. And telling profs to babysit or keep it PG is a dangerous step in the wrong direction. Oddly enough, I’ll think we’ll end up homogenizing if we keep catering to the multiplicity of hurt feelings. The real world isn’t sterilized, why should university be?
Ryerson to get new hockey arena
Federal government kicks in $20 million to develop Maple Leaf Gardens
Ryerson’s Rams are finally getting a new arena just a few blocks from campus, as the federal government kicks in $20 million to revamp Maple Leaf Gardens. The historic arena was purchased by grocer Loblaw Companies Ltd. in 2004 but has remained largely unused for various operational reasons. The arena will reopen in 2011.
The Gardens will be home to a grocery store on the first floor, with an athletic facility occupying the second. The top floor will largely be dedicated to a hockey arena, the same size as the original, and with the capacity to host 5,000 fans. Volleyball and basketball will also be played on the third floor, the Globe and Mail reported.
Earlier this year, Ryerson students voted to pay an extra $126 per year in athletic fees for new facilities that will help fund Ryerson’s portion of the deal, also $20 million. The remaining third of the $60 million project will be raised through donations. A $5 million donation has already come from Loblaw’s Weston family.
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Transport and Infrastructure Minister John Baird, Ryerson president Sheldon Levy and Loblaws chairman Galen Weston all made the announcement jointly.
Maple Leaf Gardens opened in 1931, hosting its first Maple Leaf game on Nov. 12 that year, when the Maple Leafs lost 2-1 to the Chicago Blackhawks. Loblaws has said it will maintain the existing facades of the arena, as well as existing rooflines “with the majority of development taking place within the building’s interior.”
This story has been updated
With files from the Canadian Press
Tough times force more Ontario students to apply for aid
U of T has seen a 12 per cent increase in financial aid applications
The number of requests for student financial aid is on the rise in Ontario after a dismal economic year for young people, and university officials say it could be just the start of a flood of applicants that will wash over universities this fall.
“The messages we’re getting from students and their families is that the parents may have had full-time jobs in the early part of 2008, but things happened in 2009 and parents now have lower incomes this year,” said David Sidebottom, manager of financial aid services, admissions and awards at the University of Toronto, as he explained one reason for the increase.
The university has seen a 12 per cent increase in financial aid applications for the school year.
“Parents’ incomes have taken a hit in some cases,” said Sidebottom, who has been fielding calls from anxious students who’ve also struggled to find jobs to pay for their pricey education.
“Students have been having trouble finding full-time jobs going the whole summer,” said Sidebottom, adding that the municipal strike in Toronto also affected students relying on work with city run programs.
Ontario Student Assistance Program applications are up 5.7 per cent this year for colleges and 4.6 per cent for universities, said Patrick O’Jorman, a spokesperson for the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities.
“It corresponds to the total number of applicants to schools,” said O’Jorman, who said university applications are also up five per cent.
Last week’s job report also painted a bleak picture for young people, showing a record student unemployment rate of 21 per cent in July.
For Rodney Diverlus, a 19-year-old student from Ryerson University, the challenge to find a summer job to pay his $5,500 tuition as a dance major was daunting and the choices were sparse.
Diverlus, who had worked for event planning organizations and NGOs in previous years, said he hoped to return to similar work, but his summer job became obsolete.
He said months of perusing job posting websites and following possible leads yielded scant results.
“There are moments where you get angry, and there are moments where you ask yourself could I have done more, but after applying for so many jobs, I don’t know,” said a frustrated Diverlus, who had no intention of applying for OSAP this year, but was forced to take out a student loan to pay for school.
Ryerson admits privacy breach
Personal data of 588 students, including social insurance numbers, exposed online
Ryerson University has disclosed a privacy breach which resulted in the personal data of 588 students being exposed.
The university, in a news release this morning, says the breach has been corrected and they do not believe any harm will come to the affected students. The breach resulted in the exposure of personal data including, in many cases, social insurance numbers.
Last year, Carleton and Memorial also had breaches that exposed private data.
More student elections: StFX, UBC, and Ryerson
Two more elections to note. Voter turnout at UBC was only 1214.4 per cent. The winner of the presidential race, Blake Frederick, was disqualified by the Elections Committee for “slate-like” behaviour. The Alma Mater Society at UBC banned slates a few years ago, a good background article on the ban was published in The Ubyssey [...]
Two more elections to note.
Voter turnout at UBC was only 1214.4 per cent.
The winner of the presidential race, Blake Frederick, was disqualified by the Elections Committee for “slate-like” behaviour. The Alma Mater Society at UBC banned slates a few years ago, a good background article on the ban was published in The Ubyssey this week. (I’m planning to write on the slate-ban this weekend)
Turnout at Ryerson was up, but still very low by national standards at 14 per cent. (Thanks to Cassandra Jowett for noting this in a comment on my blog)
Voter turnout at St. Francis Xavier remains the envy of every campus in Canada with an amazing 60.24 per cent.
Ryerson renames School of Nursing
Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing named after mother of major donor
Ryerson University renamed its nursing school Wednesday after, appropriately, a nurse. The newly-dubbed Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing — the largest nursing school in Canada — takes its name from the mother of a major donor.
The Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing honours the mother of Jack Cockwell, a major donor to the university and member of the Board of Governors. Jack Cockwell and family have donated $11.5 million to Ryerson over the years, including a recent gift of $5 million directed to the School of Nursing.
Trained in South Africa during the 1930s, Daphne Cockwell served as a nurse as her first career and later worked as a volunteer with returning veterans from World War II. Today, she is 93 years of age and enjoying retirement.
“We are particularly proud that this is Canada’s first School of Nursing to be named after a nurse,” said Kileen Tucker Scott, director of the school.
“I am proud that [Ryerson's] school of nursing now bears my mother’s name,” said Jack Cockwell. “The school’s students, faculty, staff and alumni are outstanding health-care professionals who share her pride in compassionate care of the highest standard.”
The announcement comes a day after the Univeristy of Toronto received $14 million towards it’s renamed John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture.
TTC strike will surprise some students
Toronto’s subways, streetcars and buses are no longer operating after the union representing transit workers decided to walkout on legal strike with less than 90 minutes notice tonight. Thankfully for me, I did not go to Toronto for fun this evening. (I had planned to go to North York for a movie.) I would have [...]
Toronto’s subways, streetcars and buses are no longer operating after the union representing transit workers decided to walkout on legal strike with less than 90 minutes notice tonight.
Thankfully for me, I did not go to Toronto for fun this evening. (I had planned to go to North York for a movie.) I would have had an expensive taxi ride to Union Station, if I was lucky. Otherwise, I would have spent the night stranded in Toronto.
I have it good, I don’t have an exam tomorrow morning. Ryerson U has one 09:00 exam tomorrow morning. (UToronto and YorkU do not have Saturday exams)
When I’m writing a 09:00 exam, I generally go to sleep at 10pm the night before. Any student who did that will wake up to discover their subway ride doesn’t exist in the morning.
Officially, students are responsible for getting themselves to an exam regardless of a transit strike.
I’d expect Ryerson will assist students who are late because of this legal strike (it feels wildcat, but it is legal) which surprised everyone.
Additional: A commenter informs me that University of Toronto’s Scarborough campus did have exams this past Saturday. No word on the strike’s effect. As stated about Ryerson, I cannot see any university or college in Toronto not accommodating students who missed exams because of this strike.
More money for Ryerson?
Media Advisory – George Smitherman to announce new investments for local universities TORONTO, April 10 /CNW/ – George Smitherman, MPP for Toronto Centre, will make an important announcement regarding new support for local universities. He will be joined by Dr. Sheldon Levy, President of Ryerson University. << Date: Friday, April 11th, 2008 Time: 10:30 a.m. [...]
Media Advisory – George Smitherman to announce new investments for local universities
TORONTO, April 10 /CNW/ - George Smitherman, MPP for Toronto Centre, will
make an important announcement regarding new support for local universities.
He will be joined by Dr. Sheldon Levy, President of Ryerson University.
<<
Date: Friday, April 11th, 2008
Time: 10:30 a.m.
Location: Student Information and Advising Centre
Ryerson University
Jorgenson Hall, Pod 144
Victoria (Victoria & Gerrard)
Eyeopener asks "Is it time for CKLN to sign off?"
I wrote a few weeks ago about student-levy supported radio stations, traditionally known as "campus radio stations." I wrote that I do not believe that students, with their non-existent income levels, should be paying for a service used by those with an income level. At Ryerson, The Eyeopener editorial asks if students should continue funding [...]
I wrote a few weeks ago about student-levy supported radio stations, traditionally known as "campus radio stations."
I wrote that I do not believe that students, with their non-existent income levels, should be paying for a service used by those with an income level.
At Ryerson, The Eyeopener editorial asks if students should continue funding their radio station.
Universities under fire for buying ads to thank government for funding
Ryerson and U of T bought full-page advertisements after province funded separate projects
Ryerson University and the University of Toronto are under fire from the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations after placing advertisements thanking the Ontario government for recent funding announcements.
Ryerson placed advertisements in the National Post, The Globe and Mail, and Toronto Star a month ago following the announcement of $45 million in provincial funding for the university’s new Student Learning Centre.
University of Toronto purchased full-page advertisements in Tuesday’s The Globe and Mail and Toronto Star following the announcement of $15 million for the revitalization of the John P. Robarts Research Library.
“At a time when universities are critically short of resources, we have two stark examples of poor use of scarce public money,” said Brian E. Brown, president of the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations. “To spend upwards of $80,000 on full page colour advertisements to thank the government for funding, as was done by both the University of Toronto and Ryerson University, indicates poor judgement.”
The universities both defend their decisions to purchase the ads. “As a public institution, we have to open ourselves to the community,” said Robert Steiner, assistant vice-president (strategic communications) of University of Toronto. “We placed the advertisement to make sure the city of Toronto, the province and the country can consider Robarts [Library] their own.”
“We wanted to say thank you in a very big way and to express our thanks for the transformative funding,” said Janet Mowat, Manager, Public Affairs at Ryerson University.
“It is not the university’s job to advertise on behalf of government. There are much better and less expensive ways university administrators can thank government and it certainly should not be done with public funds,” Brown said.
Both Mowat and Steiner said the money for the advertisements came from funds already designated for promotional advertising directed to the community and not from public funds.
Steiner contested the cost stated by OCUFA for the advertisement. “Their number is way out of the ballpark. They are exponentially above the real cost,” says Steiner. “We negotiated a much lower rate for the advertisement.” Due to a confidentially clause in the contract, Steiner says he cannot disclose the discounted cost.
Both University of Toronto and Ryerson have embarked on ambitious plans to better integrate themselves in the community and have been advertising events on campus in major Toronto newspapers.
Ryerson election results rolling in
Race is now even close, independent candidate trailing in last place
The Ryerson Students’ Union election results are rolling in. I find interesting that the independent candidate is not doing well.
For up-to-minute coverage visit the campus media:
Ryerson University – Hub Cafeteria
I bought a banana, but I also bought a butter tart. See how that works?
![]()
The Hub strikes a nice balance between offering students what they should be eating, and what they want to be eating. For instance, I bought a banana. I smacked down my 89 cents, and wham-o, that banana was mine. But I also bought a butter tart. See how that works?
Aptly named, located as it is in the core of the downtown campus, right across from the boulder-spiked skating rink and George’s hot dog cart, the Hub’s food court is sun-challenged but sparked up with cheery signage, clean lines and a smooth flow. It houses the usual suspects: Manchu Wok, Pizza Pizza, Extreme Pita, but also newbies like Pan Geos—a mamma-mia twist on Made in Japan where you choose “Italian pasta” or “Asian noodles,” then have them tossed to order with your choice of sauce, veg and protein for $5.99.
Montague’s Deli rolls out generous wraps like our veggie on whole wheat with hummus, cheddar, and your standard sub and wrap toppings ($5.19—not cheap). Pre-fab sushi at World’s Fare looks inedible. Our slice from Pizza Pizza tastes two hours old. There’s a big lineup at the coffee spot.
The Grille Works is a real boon, with six-ounce all-beef patties grilled to order. I’m not sure how they handle this à-la-minute flame- broiling during peak hours, because I wait a good while until my cheeseburger($4.59—not cheap)is ready. But it’s worth it all the same (a good burger always is). Nice char, cooked through but still juicy, fresh toppings and an appealing foil wrapper. The fries ($1.79) are that idiotic battered variety, the type with the sticky, salty veneer. (What is that?)
There’s a cereal bar area at the court’s core, and fresh fruit, too. Another wall boasts a dozen varieties of herbal teas, and just about every outlet offers healthier mains at a fair price—should the students decide to choose them.
Bonus: they sell chocolate bars. And every (non-alcoholic) beverage known to man.
— Amy Rosen
Is there really a looming university space crunch in Toronto?
National newspapers reported an enrolment bust in February–now they say it is an inevitable boom
With a provincial election in Ontario just around the corner, now is an ideal time to lobby politicians. And nowhere is that more apparent than in the pages of The Globe and Mail and Toronto Star in their articles about the looming space crunch at Toronto universities. The presidents of the three major campuses in the GTA—the University of Toronto, York University, and Ryerson University—have all put in their two cents about what to do about the surprise surge of students expected to fill their classrooms.
Continue reading Is there really a looming university space crunch in Toronto?



