<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Police Brutality &#8211; please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:10:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe666</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-9128</link>
		<dc:creator>joe666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-9128</guid>
		<description>Lets just say this once and for all, most if not all cops are sly bastards. they abuse their power far too much and as civillians we can do nothing about it. When is the process of becoming a police officer gonna change? it seems that these days even the dumbest individual can become a cop. good cops are out there, theres just too few of them that actually do the job well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets just say this once and for all, most if not all cops are sly bastards. they abuse their power far too much and as civillians we can do nothing about it. When is the process of becoming a police officer gonna change? it seems that these days even the dumbest individual can become a cop. good cops are out there, theres just too few of them that actually do the job well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Worth noting: charges dropped stemming from March sit-in : Macleans OnCampus</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-8613</link>
		<dc:creator>Worth noting: charges dropped stemming from March sit-in : Macleans OnCampus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-8613</guid>
		<description>[...] against 9 current University of Toronto students were dropped over the Christmas break. The charges stemmed from a sit-in turned ugly back in March of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] against 9 current University of Toronto students were dropped over the Christmas break. The charges stemmed from a sit-in turned ugly back in March of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CUPE&#8217;s sit-in at York &#8220;It wasn’t officially organized by CUPE&#8221; : Macleans OnCampus</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>CUPE&#8217;s sit-in at York &#8220;It wasn’t officially organized by CUPE&#8221; : Macleans OnCampus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>[...] release, is behind the sit-in. Turns out, much like the University of Toronto Students&#8217; Union and Always Question in the spring, take CUPE&#8217;s news release should not be judged by its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] release, is behind the sit-in. Turns out, much like the University of Toronto Students&#8217; Union and Always Question in the spring, take CUPE&#8217;s news release should not be judged by its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farhad</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-4876</link>
		<dc:creator>Farhad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-4876</guid>
		<description>The accused are Farrah Miranda and Liisa Schofield, campus organizers for the Ontario Public Interest Research Group; Michal Hay, former VP university affairs at UTSU; Hayes, who is president of ASSU; Edward Wong, an ASSU executive; APUS staffers Oriel Varga and Chris Ramsaroop; recent U of T graduate Noaman Ali; Farshad Azadian and Semra Eylul Sevi, members of the activist group Always Question; and students Luis Granados, Golta Shahidi, and Gabi Rodriguez. The accused also include one minor who cannot be named, and who has been additionally charged with uttering a death threat. The minor is undergoing a separate legal process at youth court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The accused are Farrah Miranda and Liisa Schofield, campus organizers for the Ontario Public Interest Research Group; Michal Hay, former VP university affairs at UTSU; Hayes, who is president of ASSU; Edward Wong, an ASSU executive; APUS staffers Oriel Varga and Chris Ramsaroop; recent U of T graduate Noaman Ali; Farshad Azadian and Semra Eylul Sevi, members of the activist group Always Question; and students Luis Granados, Golta Shahidi, and Gabi Rodriguez. The accused also include one minor who cannot be named, and who has been additionally charged with uttering a death threat. The minor is undergoing a separate legal process at youth court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Response to Rick</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>Response to Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>The UTSU did endorse the RALLY outside simcoe Hall. The current president, the VP External and the VP UA attended planning meetings for the RALLY outside simcoe hall - just as NCSC did. The Exec also passed a motion of support and the current VP Internal even brought food to the rally, while the former VP Internal attended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UTSU did endorse the RALLY outside simcoe Hall. The current president, the VP External and the VP UA attended planning meetings for the RALLY outside simcoe hall &#8211; just as NCSC did. The Exec also passed a motion of support and the current VP Internal even brought food to the rally, while the former VP Internal attended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Hayes</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Hi all,

I am writing this message to inform you that the admin. has decided to break the commitment it made students. Despite twice confirming that if we collected 500 signatures they would halt the unnecessary expansion, they are now choosing to ignore this promise. To add insult to injury, they went ahead with the expansion without even telling us!

Please see below for the message we sent to the administration on Thursday. We have yet to hear anything back from the administration other that they are working on a &quot;formal response&quot;. This confirms that they have broken their commitment.

Unfortunately this sort of behaviour is what we have come to expect from the university administration. This further underscores the need for real student-run spaces on campus and meaningful decision-making processes in which students are fully involved from the beginning of any process and have parity in representation.

If you would like to voice your dissatisfaction with this decision and continued support for more student-run spaces and healthy, diverse, and affordable food options, we encourage you to contact the following people:

Meric Gertler, Dean Faculty of Arts and Science (meric.gertler@utoronto.ca)
Anne MacDonald, Director of Ancillary Services (anne.macdonald@utoronto.ca)
CC: ASSU (students.assu@utoronto.ca)

Much respect to all those who have gotten involved in the campaign so far! The struggle continues...

****

Hello Anne and Dean Gertler,

After we had raised concerns about the lack of student consultation with respect to the Second Cup expansion at the expense of student outreach space in the Sid Smith lobby, Dean Sinervo made a special point of giving us a heads-up about the proposed Tim Horton&#039;s expansion and asking for our feedback.

In our meeting with Donna Baba (FAS Office of Planning &amp; Information Technology) on Feb. 19 we were told that the proposed Tim Horton&#039;s expansion in the Sid Smith caf at the expense of already limited student space would be halted if we showed that there was significant opposition, namely if we collected 500 signatures in a petition. This was confirmed in our meeting with Anne MacDonald (Ancillary Services) on Feb. 26.

Only after we had ran an incredibly successful and high-profile campaign, collecting well over 500 signatures, were we informed by Anne MacDonald on Mar. 11 of any concerns. She stated that she had noticed some &quot;factual errors&quot; in our petition, although she noted that she should have made this known &quot;some time ago&quot;. She closed by stating that Julia from FAS or herself would get back to us.

Despite our response, including a request for an explanation of any factual inaccuracies for future reference, we have yet to hear anything. However, we maintained good faith that the administration would honour its commitment to students, especially after so many had made their concerns known - and quite clearly. Therefore, we were completely shocked to be forwaded an email notifying building occupants that the expansion was going ahead.

Are we to understand that administration is reneging on the commitment it made to students?

I would appreciate receiving a response as soon as possible.

Best,

Ryan Hayes
President, ASSU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I am writing this message to inform you that the admin. has decided to break the commitment it made students. Despite twice confirming that if we collected 500 signatures they would halt the unnecessary expansion, they are now choosing to ignore this promise. To add insult to injury, they went ahead with the expansion without even telling us!</p>
<p>Please see below for the message we sent to the administration on Thursday. We have yet to hear anything back from the administration other that they are working on a &#8220;formal response&#8221;. This confirms that they have broken their commitment.</p>
<p>Unfortunately this sort of behaviour is what we have come to expect from the university administration. This further underscores the need for real student-run spaces on campus and meaningful decision-making processes in which students are fully involved from the beginning of any process and have parity in representation.</p>
<p>If you would like to voice your dissatisfaction with this decision and continued support for more student-run spaces and healthy, diverse, and affordable food options, we encourage you to contact the following people:</p>
<p>Meric Gertler, Dean Faculty of Arts and Science (meric.gertler@utoronto.ca)<br />
Anne MacDonald, Director of Ancillary Services (anne.macdonald@utoronto.ca)<br />
CC: ASSU (students.assu@utoronto.ca)</p>
<p>Much respect to all those who have gotten involved in the campaign so far! The struggle continues&#8230;</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Hello Anne and Dean Gertler,</p>
<p>After we had raised concerns about the lack of student consultation with respect to the Second Cup expansion at the expense of student outreach space in the Sid Smith lobby, Dean Sinervo made a special point of giving us a heads-up about the proposed Tim Horton&#8217;s expansion and asking for our feedback.</p>
<p>In our meeting with Donna Baba (FAS Office of Planning &amp; Information Technology) on Feb. 19 we were told that the proposed Tim Horton&#8217;s expansion in the Sid Smith caf at the expense of already limited student space would be halted if we showed that there was significant opposition, namely if we collected 500 signatures in a petition. This was confirmed in our meeting with Anne MacDonald (Ancillary Services) on Feb. 26.</p>
<p>Only after we had ran an incredibly successful and high-profile campaign, collecting well over 500 signatures, were we informed by Anne MacDonald on Mar. 11 of any concerns. She stated that she had noticed some &#8220;factual errors&#8221; in our petition, although she noted that she should have made this known &#8220;some time ago&#8221;. She closed by stating that Julia from FAS or herself would get back to us.</p>
<p>Despite our response, including a request for an explanation of any factual inaccuracies for future reference, we have yet to hear anything. However, we maintained good faith that the administration would honour its commitment to students, especially after so many had made their concerns known &#8211; and quite clearly. Therefore, we were completely shocked to be forwaded an email notifying building occupants that the expansion was going ahead.</p>
<p>Are we to understand that administration is reneging on the commitment it made to students?</p>
<p>I would appreciate receiving a response as soon as possible.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ryan Hayes<br />
President, ASSU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamR</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>SamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Ah, Rick, still playing the propagandist as always. No matter what formalities may or may not have taken place, it is common knowledge that UTSU, ASSU, CFS, et. al. were behind this. Sort of the way that America fights proxy wars all over the world and officially denies involvement.

It is worth noting that the ASSU president got stomped in his bid for re-election. SFU is out. Kwantlen is next. The chickens are coming home to roost, so to speak.

p.s. Still messing with SFBA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Rick, still playing the propagandist as always. No matter what formalities may or may not have taken place, it is common knowledge that UTSU, ASSU, CFS, et. al. were behind this. Sort of the way that America fights proxy wars all over the world and officially denies involvement.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that the ASSU president got stomped in his bid for re-election. SFU is out. Kwantlen is next. The chickens are coming home to roost, so to speak.</p>
<p>p.s. Still messing with SFBA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>Wow, that video was hillarious, in a pathetic sort of way. It looked to me like the students really wanted to be beat up so they could feel like real protestors or something...and the poor policemen looked so confused! The only brutality was done to my eardrums with that unnecessary screaming. Really, if those students had ever been in real danger of actually getting beat up, they&#039;d be running for their lives instead of comfortably standing around with all the time in the world to shout &quot;Shame on you!&quot; I bet they&#039;ll look back in 20 years and cringe at the memory--at least, I hope they&#039;ll be grown up enough by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that video was hillarious, in a pathetic sort of way. It looked to me like the students really wanted to be beat up so they could feel like real protestors or something&#8230;and the poor policemen looked so confused! The only brutality was done to my eardrums with that unnecessary screaming. Really, if those students had ever been in real danger of actually getting beat up, they&#8217;d be running for their lives instead of comfortably standing around with all the time in the world to shout &#8220;Shame on you!&#8221; I bet they&#8217;ll look back in 20 years and cringe at the memory&#8211;at least, I hope they&#8217;ll be grown up enough by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Telfer</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Telfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Joey,

A statement from UTSU is indeed forthcoming. Take it from me, as UTSU&#039;s General Manager -- i.e., chief administrator -- that neither the UTSU Executive nor Board authorized/approved/endorsed the protest. Nor was there proper authorization to issue the release for which you have provided a link. That statement was released by a single executive member of UTSU, acting unilaterally, and in violation of UTSU protocol stipulating that the President either serves as the spokesperson OR delegates such authority on an as needed basis. If you want confirmation of these facts, then you may e-mail the UTSU President at: president@utsu.ca

Also see: http://www.utsu.ca/?section_id=1&amp;content_id=434

I would not make this up or post it publicly, in writing, if it was not true.

Rick Telfer
UTSU General Manager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey,</p>
<p>A statement from UTSU is indeed forthcoming. Take it from me, as UTSU&#8217;s General Manager &#8212; i.e., chief administrator &#8212; that neither the UTSU Executive nor Board authorized/approved/endorsed the protest. Nor was there proper authorization to issue the release for which you have provided a link. That statement was released by a single executive member of UTSU, acting unilaterally, and in violation of UTSU protocol stipulating that the President either serves as the spokesperson OR delegates such authority on an as needed basis. If you want confirmation of these facts, then you may e-mail the UTSU President at: <a href="mailto:president@utsu.ca">president@utsu.ca</a></p>
<p>Also see: <a href="http://www.utsu.ca/?section_id=1&#038;content_id=434" rel="nofollow">http://www.utsu.ca/?section_id=1&#038;content_id=434</a></p>
<p>I would not make this up or post it publicly, in writing, if it was not true.</p>
<p>Rick Telfer<br />
UTSU General Manager</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe Marchand</title>
		<link>http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe Marchand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2008/03/22/police-brutality-please/#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>&quot;By attacking the administration of U of T for the proposed residence fee hike, these student radicals are attacking the very capitalist institution itself. Just because you vote against the fee hikes and don’t want to see fees rise doesn’t mean you will get your way. When more money is needed, government raises taxes. When the University needs more money, they will do the same.&quot;

Daniel: Isn&#039;t forcing people to pay taxes to subsidize anyone&#039;s education already &quot;an attack on the very capitalist institution itself&quot;? I don&#039;t think you need student radicals for that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;By attacking the administration of U of T for the proposed residence fee hike, these student radicals are attacking the very capitalist institution itself. Just because you vote against the fee hikes and don’t want to see fees rise doesn’t mean you will get your way. When more money is needed, government raises taxes. When the University needs more money, they will do the same.&#8221;</p>
<p>Daniel: Isn&#8217;t forcing people to pay taxes to subsidize anyone&#8217;s education already &#8220;an attack on the very capitalist institution itself&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think you need student radicals for that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

